וְעַתָּ֖ה קְחוּ־לִ֣י מְנַגֵּ֑ן וְהָיָה֙ כְּנַגֵּ֣ן הַֽמְנַגֵּ֔ן וַתְּהִ֥י עָלָ֖יו יַד־יְהוָֽה׃
“Ngayon nga, dalhan ninyo ako ng isang manunugtog.” At nangyari, habang tumutugtog ang manunugtog, na dumating sa kanya ang kamay ng Walang-Hanggan.
Ein Yaakov (Glick Edition)
R. Juda the son of R. Samuel b. Shilath in the name of Rab said: "The sages wanted to suppress (declare uncanonical) the book of Ecclesiastes because its words are contradictory; but why did they not suppress it? Because it begins and ends with words concerning the Torah. It begins with the words concerning the Torah, for it is written (Ecc. 1, 3.) What profit hath a man of all his toil which he toileth under the sun? Whereupon the school of Janai said, for a thing which [was created] under the sun he hath no profit, but for a thing which is beyond the sun (before creation) he will have profit. It ends with words concerning the Torah, for it is written (Ib. 12, 13.) The end of the matter is, let us hear the whole; fear God and keep His commandments; for this is the whole (duty of) man. What is meant by, this is the whole man? R. Eliezer said: "It means the whole world was created for the sake of him (who fears God)." R. Abba b. Cahana said: "This [fear of God] is equal in importance to the whole world put together." Simon b. Azai and, according to others, Simon b. Zoma, said: "The whole world would not have been created if not for the purpose of providing him (who fears God) with company." And what are the words which contradict each other? It is written (Ecc. 7, 3.) Better is vexation than laughing; and again it is written (Ib. 2, 2.) Of laughter I said, it maketh one praiseworthy; and it is also written (Ib. 8, 15.) Therefore do I praise joy: and again (Ib. 2, 2.) And of joy what doth this do? There is no contradiction; Better is vexation than laughing, means that, the vexation which the Holy One, praised be He! causeth unto the righteous in this world is better than the smile which the Holy One, praised be He! causeth unto the wicked in this world; Of laughter I said, it maketh one praiseworthy, speaks of the smile with which the Holy One, praised be He! will gladden the righteous in the world to come. Therefore do I praise joyfulness, refers to a rejoicing which is caused by a meritorious deed; And of joy what doth this do? alludes to rejoicing which is not the cause of a meritorious deed. We infer from this that Shechinah rests not upon a mood of indolence, nor a mood of grief, nor a mood of laughter, nor a mood of levity, nor a mood of jesting, nor a mood of idle talk, but upon a mood of rejoicing caused by the performance of a meritorious deed; as it is said (II Kings 3, 15.) But now bring me a musician, etc, R. Juda said: "The same should be applied to the study of the Halacha (Laws)." Raba said: "The same is to be applied to a good dream." Is it so? [that Halacha should be preceded by a cheerful thing] . Behold, R. Gidel in the name of Rab said: "Any disciple who sits before his teacher without dropping bitterness from his lips [on account of respect] will be burnt, for it is said (Songs 5, 13.) His lips like lillies, dropping with fluid myrrh. Do not read Mor (fluid myrrh), but read it Mar (bitterness. Do not read Shoshanim (lilies) but read it Sheshonin (who study); [hence we see that a disciple must act with deep respect, and not in a frivolous mood]. This is not difficult to explain: the former refers to the teacher and the latter refers to the disciple; and if you wish you may say both refer to the teacher; and even then there is no contradiction; for the former refers to the time before beginning [the lecture] and the latter refers to the time after the lecture has begun. Just as Rabba did before he began [his lecture] before the Rabbis. He said something humorous which caused the Rabbis to be cheerful, and he then sat down with deep respect to expound the Halacha.
Eikhah Rabbah
“Arise, cry out at night, at the beginning of the watches, pour out your heart like water before the face of the Lord. Lift up your hands to Him for the life of your infants, who are faint with hunger at the head of every street” (Lamentations 2:19).
“Arise, cry out at night, at the beginning of the watches.” Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says: There are four watches during the night and four watches during the day. The ona is one twenty-fourth of the et,123The text should read: The ona is one twenty-fourth of an hour (Etz Yosef). and the et is one twenty-fourth of the ona. The rega is one twenty-fourth of the et. How long is a rega? Rabbi Berekhya said in the name of Rabbi Ḥelbo: As long as it takes to say it. The Rabbis say: Like the blink of an eye. Shmuel said: One fifty-six thousand five hundred and forty-eighth of an hour; that is a rega. Rabbi Natan said: There are three watches during the night.
Rabbi Zerika and Rabbi Ami said in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish: One verse says: “At midnight I rise to give You thanks” (Psalms 119:62), and one verse says: “My eyes precede the night watches” (Psalms 119:148). How can these two verses be reconciled? Rabbi Ḥizkiya, and some say Rabbi Zerika and Rabbi Ami: One said the source according to Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] and one says the source according to Rabbi Natan. The one who says the source according to Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi], it works out well.124There are four watches during the night, two before midnight and two after midnight. Thus, if one rises at midnight, that is still before two of the nightly watches. These verses can thus be a source for the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi that the night is divided into four watches. The one who says the source according to Rabbi Natan: “At the beginning of the middle watch” (Judges 7:19).125If there is a middle watch, there must be an odd number of watches. This can serve as a source for the opinion of Rabbi Natan that the night is divided into three watches.
But Rabbi Natan, how does he interpret “at midnight”? Rather, at times “at midnight,” and at times: “My eyes precede the night watches.”126The two verses do not both mean the same thing, as according to Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi. Rather, King David, the author of Psalms, is stating that at times he awoke at midnight, and at times even earlier, before two of the three nightly watches. What would [David] do? When David would conduct his meal alone, he would eat until nine hours of the day, sleep until the beginning of the middle watch, and arise and engage in Torah study. When David would eat a feast of kings, he would eat until the evening, sleep until midnight, and arise and engage in Torah study from midnight onward.
In any case, dawn would not arrive with David asleep. That is what David said: “Awaken, my soul, awaken, harp and lyre; I will wake the dawn” (Psalms 57:9). Let my honor awaken before the honor of my Creator; my honor is nothing before the honor of my Creator. “I will wake the dawn,” I wake the dawn, the dawn does not awaken me.
Rabbi Pinḥas said in the name of Rabbi Elazar bar Menaḥem: A lyre was placed under his head and he would rise and play it at night. Rabbi Levi said: A lyre was suspended over David’s bed. When midnight arrived, the north wind would come and the lyre would play on its own. That is what is written: “It was as the instrument played” (II Kings 3:15). It is not written here “It was as he played the instrument,” but rather: “It was as the instrument played,” the instrument played on its own. When David would hear its sound, he would arise and engage in Torah study. [People] would say: If David king of Israel is engaging in Torah study, all the more so for us. They immediately would begin engaging in Torah study.
How does Rabbi interpret the verse of Rabbi Natan? Rabbi Huna said: The end of the second and the beginning of the third, which constitutes the midpoint [metavḥot] of the night. Rabbi Mani said: Had it said “middle [tikhonot],”127Had the verse used the plural term for “middle” that would allow for it to be interpreted in accordance with Rabbi Yehua HaNasi, who holds that the night is divided into four watches. that would be correct. But does it not say “middle [tikhona]”?128This term is singular. The first is not counted, as until then, the time has not yet arrived.129The concept of dividing the night into periods of time called watches parallels when an earthly king would have soldiers standing guard. The first quarter of the night is not yet the time for guards, because people are still awake.
“Arise, cry out at night, at the beginning of the watches.” Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] says: There are four watches during the night and four watches during the day. The ona is one twenty-fourth of the et,123The text should read: The ona is one twenty-fourth of an hour (Etz Yosef). and the et is one twenty-fourth of the ona. The rega is one twenty-fourth of the et. How long is a rega? Rabbi Berekhya said in the name of Rabbi Ḥelbo: As long as it takes to say it. The Rabbis say: Like the blink of an eye. Shmuel said: One fifty-six thousand five hundred and forty-eighth of an hour; that is a rega. Rabbi Natan said: There are three watches during the night.
Rabbi Zerika and Rabbi Ami said in the name of Rabbi Shimon ben Lakish: One verse says: “At midnight I rise to give You thanks” (Psalms 119:62), and one verse says: “My eyes precede the night watches” (Psalms 119:148). How can these two verses be reconciled? Rabbi Ḥizkiya, and some say Rabbi Zerika and Rabbi Ami: One said the source according to Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi] and one says the source according to Rabbi Natan. The one who says the source according to Rabbi [Yehuda HaNasi], it works out well.124There are four watches during the night, two before midnight and two after midnight. Thus, if one rises at midnight, that is still before two of the nightly watches. These verses can thus be a source for the opinion of Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi that the night is divided into four watches. The one who says the source according to Rabbi Natan: “At the beginning of the middle watch” (Judges 7:19).125If there is a middle watch, there must be an odd number of watches. This can serve as a source for the opinion of Rabbi Natan that the night is divided into three watches.
But Rabbi Natan, how does he interpret “at midnight”? Rather, at times “at midnight,” and at times: “My eyes precede the night watches.”126The two verses do not both mean the same thing, as according to Rabbi Yehuda HaNasi. Rather, King David, the author of Psalms, is stating that at times he awoke at midnight, and at times even earlier, before two of the three nightly watches. What would [David] do? When David would conduct his meal alone, he would eat until nine hours of the day, sleep until the beginning of the middle watch, and arise and engage in Torah study. When David would eat a feast of kings, he would eat until the evening, sleep until midnight, and arise and engage in Torah study from midnight onward.
In any case, dawn would not arrive with David asleep. That is what David said: “Awaken, my soul, awaken, harp and lyre; I will wake the dawn” (Psalms 57:9). Let my honor awaken before the honor of my Creator; my honor is nothing before the honor of my Creator. “I will wake the dawn,” I wake the dawn, the dawn does not awaken me.
Rabbi Pinḥas said in the name of Rabbi Elazar bar Menaḥem: A lyre was placed under his head and he would rise and play it at night. Rabbi Levi said: A lyre was suspended over David’s bed. When midnight arrived, the north wind would come and the lyre would play on its own. That is what is written: “It was as the instrument played” (II Kings 3:15). It is not written here “It was as he played the instrument,” but rather: “It was as the instrument played,” the instrument played on its own. When David would hear its sound, he would arise and engage in Torah study. [People] would say: If David king of Israel is engaging in Torah study, all the more so for us. They immediately would begin engaging in Torah study.
How does Rabbi interpret the verse of Rabbi Natan? Rabbi Huna said: The end of the second and the beginning of the third, which constitutes the midpoint [metavḥot] of the night. Rabbi Mani said: Had it said “middle [tikhonot],”127Had the verse used the plural term for “middle” that would allow for it to be interpreted in accordance with Rabbi Yehua HaNasi, who holds that the night is divided into four watches. that would be correct. But does it not say “middle [tikhona]”?128This term is singular. The first is not counted, as until then, the time has not yet arrived.129The concept of dividing the night into periods of time called watches parallels when an earthly king would have soldiers standing guard. The first quarter of the night is not yet the time for guards, because people are still awake.
Midrash Tanchuma
(Numb. 25:16-17:) “Then the Lord spoke [unto Moses], saying, ‘Harass the Midianites […].’” Why?5Numb. R. 21:4. (Numb. 25:18:) “Because they are harassing you.” Hence the sages have said, “If someone comes to kill you, act first to kill him.”6Ber. 62b; Sanh. 72a. R. Simeon says, “Whoever causes a person to sin is worse than the one who kills him. Because whoever kills [a person] kills him in this world, but he [still] has a share in the world to come. However, the one who causes him to sin kills him in this world and for the world to come. Two peoples encountered Israel with the sword, the Egyptians and the Edomites. Thus it is stated (of the Egyptians that they said (in Exod. 15:9), “I will pursue, I will overtake, [I will divide the spoil…].” And Edom [did the same], as stated (in Numb. 20:18), “But Edom said unto him, ‘You shall not pass through me, or else I will come out to meet you with the sword.’” Moreover, two [peoples encountered them] with sin, Moab and the Ammonites. Concerning the ones who encountered them with the sword, it is written (in Deut. 23:8), “You shall not abhor an Edomite …; you shall not abhor an Egyptian.” But concerning the ones who encountered them with sin to cause Israel to sin, it is stated (according to Deut. 23:4), “No Ammonite or Moabite shall come into the assembly of the Lord […].” And in this world you have not [yet] fulfilled your obligation, as stated (in Numb. 25:17), “Harass the Midianites.” (Numb. 25:17:) “Harass the Midianites.” What is the meaning of “Harass the Midianites?” Even though it is written in the Torah (in Deut. 20:10), “When you draw near unto a city to fight against it, you shall offer terms of peace (shalom) unto it”; however, in regard to these [peoples] you shall not do this; (according to Deut. 23:7), “You shall not seek their welfare (shalom) and benefit all your days forever.”7Numb. R. 21:5. You find that the one who came to them with the trait of mercy, in the end came to disgrace, war and distress. And who [was that]? David, as stated (in II Sam. 10:2), “David said, ‘I will do kindness with Hanun son of Nahash.’” The Holy One, blessed be He, said to him, “You are transgressing My word, as I wrote (in Deut. 23:7), ‘You shall not seek their welfare and benefit,’ and you are doing acts of kindness with them? (Eccl. 7:12:) ‘Do not be greatly righteous,’ such that a man should not forego [what is written in] the Torah. And this one is sending [word] to console the Children of Ammon and to do kindness and good to him?” And in the end, he came to disgrace [as stated] (in II Sam. 10:4), “So Hanun seized David’s courtiers, clipped off one side of their beards [and cut away half of their garments at the buttocks, and sent them off].” And he came to disgrace, and afterwards to war with four nations: Aram-Naharayim, with the kings of Zova, with the kings of Maakha and with Children of Ammon. And it is written (about this in II Sam. 10:9), “Joab saw that there was a battle line against him both front and rear.” What caused him [this]? That he sought to do good to those about whom the Holy One, blessed be He, told him, “You shall not seek their welfare and benefit.” Hence it is written (Numb. 25:17), “Harass the Midianites.” Another interpretation (of Numb. 25:17), “Harass (tsrwr) the Midianites.” Even though I have written (in Deut. 20:19), “When you besiege (rt. tswr) a city a [long time] […], you shall not destroy its trees,”8Numb. R. 21:6. in the case of these (i.e., Moab and the Ammonites) you shall not do so. On the contrary, their trees you shall destroy. And so you find that when Joram king of Israel, Jehoshaphat king of Judah, and the king of Edom went to fight with Moab, (according to II Kings 3:9) “they circled around on a seven-day march, so that there was no water for the army or for the animals that were with them.” They began to weep, and (according to vs. 10) “The king of Israel said, ‘Alas, for the Lord has summoned these three kings to give them into the hand of Moab.’” Jehoshaphat answered (in vs. 11), “Is there no prophet of the Lord here through, who we may inquire of the Lord…?” [This passage is] to make known the wickedness of Joram, in that he did not acknowledge Him. (Vs. 12:) “Then Jehoshaphat said, ‘the word of the Lord is with him’; so the king of Israel, Jehoshaphat, and the king of Edom went down unto him.” Why is Jehoshaphat not called a king here? In order to make known the humility of that righteous man, in that he did not want to go down before the prophet in royal garb, but as a commoner.9Gk.: idiotes. But some say, “[It was] because an edict had been decreed that he would be killed with Ahab that the scriptural text has reckoned [the reign of] his son from that hour. For that reason ‘king’ was not written.” But as a reward for their going down to the prophet, they attained the right to see all those miracles. When the king of Israel saw Elisha, Elisha said to the king of Israel (according to vs. 13,) “What have I to do with you; go unto the prophets of your father and unto the prophets of your mother.” He began to implore him. (Ibid., cont.:) “And the king of Israel said to him…,” as he had never asked him [anything] in his life. (Vss. 14-15:) “Elisha said, ‘As the Lord of hosts lives…Now then get me a musician….” And the rest of the whole parashah. Moreover, he said to them “The Moabites shall fall into your hands, (in vs. 19) ‘thus you shall smite every fortified city and every choice city, [you shall also fell every good tree].’” They said to him, “[But] the Holy One, blessed be He said (in Deut. 20:19), ‘You shall not destroy its trees’; yet you are saying [to do] so.” He said to them, “He gave the command with reference to the rest of the nations, but this one is insignificant and contemptable,” as stated (in II Kings 3:18), “This one is insignificant in the eyes of the Lord, so He will give Moab into your hands.” It is [also] stated (in Deut. 23:7), “You shall not seek their welfare and benefit (literally, their good).” [That is referring to] the good trees. It is therefore stated (in Numb. 25:17), “Harass the Midianites.”